Could there be opportunities for suppliers and principals and distributors and agents alike as a result of the UK leaving the EU, as is expected, on 31 October 2019 without a withdrawal agreement being in place?

 

The question may seem counter intuitive; but where supplier or principal is looking to exit a distributor or agent, Brexit could well turn out to provide an opportunity to do so. However, the same may also be the case for the distributor or agent acting for the supplier or principal.

Why is this important?

Distributorship and agency agreements exist to regulate the relationship between two parties in respect of a particular issue. But unlike other commercial contracts, the law of many countries provides specific protection for distributors in the event of termination of the distributorship agreement. The same is true – but for even more countries – in respect of agency agreements.

As a result, if the supplier gave notice to the distributor in accordance with the terms of the distributorship agreement, the supplier may be presented with a claim for compensation by the distributor for the loss of the distributorship agreement. Where the same notice is given by a principal to terminate an agency agreement, a claim for compensation can be compounded by a claim for the other statutory rights that the agent may enjoy.

Why then the possibility of Brexit opportunities?

Many distributorship and agency agreements will contain force majeure clauses. The literal meaning of force majeure is an unforeseen circumstance that prevents the fulfilment of a contract.

So far, so good. But:

• Experience shows that many force majeure clauses are poorly drafted in terms of when they operate and what are the consequences of the occurrence of an event of force majeure.
• Can it really be said that the occurrence of a hard Brexit and its consequences is an unforeseen event?

It has also been recently argued by the European Medicines Agency that the consequences of the UK leaving the EU meant that a lease of its offices had been frustrated. Thus resulting in the EMA not being liable for its continuing lease obligations. However, this argument was rejected by the English High Court.

The upshot of this is that as the distributorship or agency agreement cannot as a matter of English law be ended as a result of Brexit occurring, then it must be the case that both parties are required to continue to perform it.

As a result, it will not be possible for the distributor or agent to claim that it has been unable to do this or that as a result of Brexit. Non-performance is likely to provide an opportunity for the termination of the agreement.

Following on from this, the supplier or principal should consider the provisions in its agreement that deal with the distributor or agent’s performance obligations. Non-performance of a particular obligation may provide the opportunity to claim the distributor or agent has committed a breach; thus allowing the agreement to be terminated for cause and putting the supplier or principal in the position where they can avoid a claim for compensation.

Be careful what you wish for

The downside, of course, is that distributor or agent may claim in the event of non-performance by supplier or principal.

And finally

It is possible that the agreement will be governed by law other than English law. Indeed, in the case of agreements where one party is in the EU and there is no express reference to the law of a particular company, EU law will determine which country’s law (that of supplier or principal or distributor or agent) will apply.

This is important as the laws of many member states of the EU may take a different view as to the effect of Brexit; so resulting in termination of the agreement or a claim for damages by the distributor or agent in any event.

 

Stephen Sidkin is a partner at Fox Williams LLP
www.agentlaw.co.uk
www.fashionlaw.co.uk
www.distributionlaw.co.uk

© 2019 Fox Williams LLP