Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Widget Image
Widget Image
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim

Last month, the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA) updated its guidance on whistleblowing. The opening paragraph announcing the new guidance starts, “If you are an employee or ex-employee and wish to provide the CMA with information and/or raise a concern about your employer’s possible involvement in anti-competitive or unfair trading practices, please contact us….”.

Also last month, the CMA secured the disqualification of three company directors after finding they broke competition law by forming a cartel in their industry. Meanwhile, the French competition authority announced towards the end of July that it had fined Chanel €130,000 for forbidding online sales by eyeglass retailers, LVMH €500,000 for imposing its prices and other sales terms on opticians, and Luxottica €125m for forcing its prices and other sales terms on opticians.

In short – competition law authorities are happy to uphold the law by fining and (in the UK) disqualifying directors. It will also encourage third parties, whether employees or ex-employees, to whistleblow. Further agreements that infringe competition law are unenforceable under both UK and EU laws, and parties adversely affected by agreements that infringe competition law can pursue claims for damages.

Fox Williams is advising clients in the fashion industry on a monthly basis on issues concerning how they can:
  • Ensure price stability at retail; or
  • Control the use of the online channel; or
  • Ensure that their counterparties do not act for their competitors.

 

Stephen Sidkin head and shoulders black and white image

 

Stephen Sidkin is a partner at Fox Williams LLP (www.fashionlaw.co.uk; www.agentlaw.co.uk; and www.distributorlaw.co.uk)

© Fox Williams LLP 2021

 

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.